Google Play Store Class Action

A class action is an action that is brought by one person or a small number of persons (Applicant(s)) on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of people (class members) against another person or persons (Respondent(s)) where the Applicants and the class members have similar claims against the Respondent(s). 

Class members in a class action are not individually responsible for the legal costs associated with bringing the class action.  In a class action, only the Applicants are responsible for the costs

Class members are “bound” by the outcome in the class action, unless they have opted out of the proceeding.  A binding result can happen in two ways being either a judgment following a trial, or a settlement at any time. If there is a judgment or a settlement of a class action class members will not be able pursue the same claims and may not be able to pursue similar or related claims against the Respondent/s in other legal proceedings.  Class members should note that:

• in a judgment following trial, the Court will decide various factual and legal issues in respect of the claims made by the Applicants and class members.  Unless those decisions are successfully appealed, they bind the Applicants, class members and the Respondent.  Importantly, if there are other proceedings between a class member and the Respondents, it may be that neither of them will be permitted to raise arguments in that proceeding which are inconsistent with a factual or legal issue decided in the class action.
• in a settlement of a class action, where the settlement provides for compensation to class members it may extinguish all rights to compensation which a class member might have against the Respondents which arise in any way out of the events or transactions which are the subject-matter of the class action.

This class action is brought by the Applicants, Brett McDonald and Dark Ice Interactive Pty Limited, on their own behalf and on behalf of all persons who are “class members” as defined in the proceeding.

The action concerns Google’s conduct in relation to the Australian Play Store.  Google Asia Pacific Pte Ltd is the Google entity that contracts with app developers in relation to Android apps distributed through the Play Store to users in Australia. Google Payment Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Google LLC, accepts and facilitates the processing of payments for Play Store apps and in-app purchases in Australia. During part of the Relevant Period, Google charged developers a 30% fee on these purchases, or in some cases, 15%.

The Applicants allege that from 6 November 2017 to 20 June 2022:

• Google had a substantial degree of power in a market for the supply of services for the distribution of Android apps to users of Android smartphones and tablets (the Australian Android Mobile App Distribution Market), a market for the supply of licences for mobile operating systems (the Mobile OS Licensing Market), and a market for the supply of services to Android app developers for accepting and processing payments for the purchase of digital content within an Android App (the Australian Android In-App Payment Solutions Market).
• Google entered into agreements with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and Android app developers and engaged in conduct which had the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in the markets described above.
• As well, Google was able to charge fees on the purchase of Android apps via the Australian Play Store and in-app purchases within those apps materially higher than the fees it would have been able to charge if not for the allegedly contravening conduct.
• By the above conduct, Google, among other things:
  • entered into contracts which, by imposing restrictive terms on OEMs and Android app developers, prevented or hindered those developers from distributing Android apps other than through the Australian Play Store and from using payment solutions other than those controlled by Google within Android apps distributed via the Australian Play Store; and
  • supplied services to app developers for the distribution of Android apps on the condition that those developers not use payment solutions other than those controlled by Google for payments of Android app purchases via the Australian Play Store and of in-app purchases from Android apps distributed via the Australian Play Store.
• The above conduct had the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in the following markets:
  • the Australian Android Mobile App Distribution Market; and/or
  • the Australian Android In-App Payment Solutions Market,

in contravention of ss. 45, 46 and 47 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

• This conduct resulted in materially higher prices for users who purchased apps and in-app digital content through the Australian Play Store.
• The above conduct also was, in all the circumstances, unconscionable in contravention of s. 21 of the Australian Consumer Law.

The Applicants seek compensation for eligible purchasers and app developers from Google for the alleged excess fees charged.

The Respondents deny that they have engaged in the alleged contravening conduct or that such conduct resulted in materially higher prices and are defending the class action.

A first stage trial of the Google Play Store Class Action (First Stage Trial) concluded on 5 July 2024. At the First Stage Trial, the Court heard evidence of:

• the Applicant’s claims that Google contravened the provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and Australian Consumer Law listed above, and
• that Google’s conduct allowed it to charge fees on purchases of Android apps and in-app digital content from Android apps that were materially higher than the fees would have been if not for the allegedly contravening conduct.

The First Stage Trial of the class action was heard together with a trial in a separate but related legal action that has been commenced by Epic Games, Inc. and Epic Games International S.à r.l. (together, Epic Games), in which Epic Games also alleges that Google contravened the same provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and Australian Consumer Law listed above.

The parties have agreed that the Applicants and class members (who have not opted out) will be bound by all findings of fact, findings of law and mixed findings of fact and law made as part of the First Stage Trial.  

If the class action is successful at the First Stage Trial, a second stage trial may be held at a later date to determine the loss or damage suffered by class members (if any) as a result of Google’s conduct.

A potential conflict of interest may arise between app developer class members and app purchaser class members on questions relating to the allocation of loss and damage between them, including in relation to questions concerning the extent to which app developer class members would have passed on any reduction in fees to app purchaser class members. The Applicants will take appropriate steps to manage any potential conflict of interest.

You are a class member if at any time during the Relevant Period you:

Either:

• Purchased: (i) an app on an Android smartphone or tablet from the Australian Play Store; and/or (ii) in-app digital content within such an app; and suffered loss or damage by reason of the conduct of Google pleaded in the Applicants’ originating application and statement of claim; or

• Supplied: (i) an app on Android smartphones or tablets via the Australian Play Store; and/or (ii) in-app digital content within such an Android app; and suffered loss or damage by reason of the conduct of Google pleaded in the Applicants’ originating application and statement of claim; and

Were not, during any part of the Relevant Period, and are not, as at the date of the Applicants’ originating application, any of the following:

• a related party (as defined by s 228 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) of any Respondent;
• a related body corporate (as defined by s 50 of the Corporations Act) of any Respondent;
• an associated entity (as defined by s 50AAA of the Corporations Act) of any Respondent;
• an officer or associate (as defined by s 9 and s 11 of the Corporations Act) of any Respondent; or
• a Justice or the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, or a Justice or the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia;
• a solicitor or barrister acting for the Applicants or the Respondents;
• an expert or professional adviser briefed in relation to this proceeding;
• an employee or officer of a litigation funder providing funding for the proceeding; or
• an employee or officer of an insurer providing after the event insurance for any party to the proceeding.

You may also be excluded from participating in the class action if you have released Google from any claims related to the facts underlying this class action, for example, in the context of a class action overseas.    

The Google Play Store Class Action is being funded partly by a litigation funder, CF FLA Australia Investments 2 Pty Ltd, which is an Australian proprietary company owned and controlled by funds managed by Fortress Investment Group LLC (CF FLA). Phi Finney McDonald and Maurice Blackburn are deferring payment of the portion of their legal fees that are not being paid by CF FLA. For more information about how the class action is funded please refer to the Opt Out Notice or contact us using the contact details provided. 

You will not become liable for any legal costs simply by remaining as a class member.  However, if any compensation becomes payable to you as a result of any order, judgment or settlement in the Google Play Store Class Action, the Court may make an order that some of that compensation be used to help pay a share of the costs which are incurred by the Applicant in running the class action, but which are not able to be recovered from the Respondents. Any such amounts will only be payable in the event of a successful outcome by way of a deduction from any compensation to which you become entitled and will never exceed the amount of compensation to which you may otherwise become entitled. For more information about legal costs please contact us using the contact details provided.

Unless you have opted out by the opt out deadline of 4:00 pm (AEDT) 23 February 2024, you will be bound by any settlement or judgment of the Google Play Store Class Action.  If the class action is successful you will be entitled to share in the benefit of any order, judgment or settlement in favour of the Applicant and class members, although you may have to satisfy certain conditions before your entitlement arises.  If the action is unsuccessful or is not as successful as you might have wished, you will not be able pursue the same claims and may not be able to pursue related claims against the Respondents in other legal proceedings.

If you want to register to be kept informed about developments, please do so by following the Registration link above.